Entry tags:
Arc's out!
http://arclanguage.org/
Well, that makes the "which language shall I learn next" question rather easier...
First impressions (based on reading the tutorial rather than playing with it): I like it. It embodies PG's philosophy that a language should get out of your way and let you shoot yourself in the foot because one day, you might need to do tarsal surgery and only have a pistol to hand. In many respects, it's the anti-Haskell: it encourages you to put off the decision of how to represent your data as long as possible. Here's a feature along those lines that I liked: indexes into data-structures are indistinguishable from function calls. So if I write
Well, that makes the "which language shall I learn next" question rather easier...
First impressions (based on reading the tutorial rather than playing with it): I like it. It embodies PG's philosophy that a language should get out of your way and let you shoot yourself in the foot because one day, you might need to do tarsal surgery and only have a pistol to hand. In many respects, it's the anti-Haskell: it encourages you to put off the decision of how to represent your data as long as possible. Here's a feature along those lines that I liked: indexes into data-structures are indistinguishable from function calls. So if I write
(foo 0)you have no way of knowing if foo is a list, a string or a function. Evaluation is strict by default, which I think is a net loss (but you've got macros, so it's swings and roundabouts, I suppose). The anaphoric (pronoun-introducing) macros from On Lisp are included by default - I've found pronouns to be very useful in Perl, so this can only be a Good Thing. I was amused to see that most of the language is defined in Arc, and that PG seems to think that this is a bold and novel experiment :-)
no subject
Ooh! That sounds interesting! Possibly really confusing though?
From the website: Arc is designed above all for exploratory programming: the kind where you decide what to write by writing it
My favorite kind :-) Perhaps I should venture in there too...
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
it was brought to my attention by this post on planet.haskell.
A quick google for "K2 Language" failed to find any clues about the other terse language mentioned.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
Canada Goose Jackor
(Anonymous) 2011-12-10 11:11 am (UTC)(link)karen millen clothing
(Anonymous) 2011-12-13 04:31 pm (UTC)(link)Canada Goose Jackor
(Anonymous) 2011-12-16 04:38 pm (UTC)(link)