This is mainly aimed at the Brits: apologies to the rest of you.
Glasgow University Student Representative Council (SRC) is one of only 15 students' unions around the country not to be affiliated to the National Union of Students (NUS). On Wednesday, we're having a referendum to decide whether or not to join (it's constitutionally mandated that we have such a referendum every few years). I'm pretty much decided on voting against joining, but I'd like to canvass your opinions to see if I'm about to do something daft.
In case you're wondering why: my memories of the NUS from Oxford are of one college or other trying to secede every year, and of a friend going off to Conference as the college NUS rep, then coming back in despair, telling tales of insane, vicious, antediluvian politicking that would have been considered a bit extreme at the court of the Pharaohs, and of an "organisation" that made OUSU look like a model of silent, resolute effectiveness. Joining would cost the SRC a lot of money that they don't actually have, and the SRC actually seem to do a fairly good job of representing students' interests already.
Oh, and the NUS gave the world Jack Straw. Need I say more?
Glasgow University Student Representative Council (SRC) is one of only 15 students' unions around the country not to be affiliated to the National Union of Students (NUS). On Wednesday, we're having a referendum to decide whether or not to join (it's constitutionally mandated that we have such a referendum every few years). I'm pretty much decided on voting against joining, but I'd like to canvass your opinions to see if I'm about to do something daft.
In case you're wondering why: my memories of the NUS from Oxford are of one college or other trying to secede every year, and of a friend going off to Conference as the college NUS rep, then coming back in despair, telling tales of insane, vicious, antediluvian politicking that would have been considered a bit extreme at the court of the Pharaohs, and of an "organisation" that made OUSU look like a model of silent, resolute effectiveness. Joining would cost the SRC a lot of money that they don't actually have, and the SRC actually seem to do a fairly good job of representing students' interests already.
Oh, and the NUS gave the world Jack Straw. Need I say more?
no subject
On the other hand, you should think about joining the University and College Union (the new conglomeration of the AUT and The University & College Lecturers' Union). They've been running serveys about and campaigning against the new government plans for funding university research. I meant to blog about this, actually; it would be terrible for maths (and humanities, and Chemistry, which the government are supposed to be bolstering up) and I'm furious about it.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
b) it's actually illegal to only offer student discounts to holders of NUS cards. You have to accept any valid form of student ID.
no subject
On a more pragmatic level, if you've got a bunch of people queuing up to buy cinema tickets, and the minimum-wage guy behind the counter says "Sorry, we only accept NUS cards", I don't think you'd get very far by claiming that he's breaking the law :)
no subject
So, it's not an argument peculiar to Glasgow :)
Practically, you have a point - short term power rests with the bloke with the biggest stick. Having said that, I've not had any problems with my ISIC card. I've used it several times to get discount in the cinema in croydon, which I consider to be a fair sample of minimum wage environments.
As further (possibly slightly shakier, but still worth considering) evidence of the increasing popularity of ISIC, I note that one of the pro-NUS posters I've seen knocking about IC takes pains to mention that the NUS card has an "integrated ISIC card". This suggests to me that some folk are worried about whether the NUS card will be accepted everywhere that ISIC is. Of course, IC does have quite an international demographic, so it could be that such fears come exclusively from overseas. Nonetheless - I think it speaks of the good standing of the ISIC card.
no subject
For a long time you couldnt buy guiness in NUS affilated bars because they cocked up the commercial agreements.
Also iirc the fees are quite large so that might hurt other budgets. It was certainly one of the main arguments the last tiem it came up at IC.
Interesting aside ICU last left the NUS the year after the NUS president was form IC ( Trevor Philips, broadcaster and now head of the CRE)
no subject
As far as I can see NUS exists for people who are trying to make the transition from university-level to national-level Machiavellianism, and ideally those seeking a fast track to becoming Labour MPs. Besides, the idea that the NUS can launch any kind of meaningful direct action to acheive its aims is frankly laughable. Students can't go on strike, it doesn't inconvenience anyone!
no subject
As for the purchasing power - I think the Glasgow unions are part of a thing called Northern Services (
Also, my former housemate got paid by the NUS simply to attend conferences. Seriously, that's how he earned his living for a few years, and as much as I love him, that definitely makes me question their ability to spend money wisely as an organisation.
no subject
no subject
no subject
Dearie me, I'm beginning to sounds like an ISIC promoter :-) Now one totally pointless card they try to push on you at STA, when you're not a student any more, is the U26 card. Cause then you can, for example, get discounts on international train tickets, cause it proves you're under 26, which can't be proved otherwise using rubbish tacky bits of ID like, say, a passport. And in any case, just cause you want international train tickets, who is to assume that you have a passport?
no subject
no subject
I think the supposed main driver for this latest debate is that we're going independent from the University of London this academic year, so there are those that'd like to have a higher student authority outside college. Having said that, almost all the campaign posters I've seen have said "The NUS Sucks", and the few I have seen that are in favour of joining seem to be about "hassle free discounts", which I've been getting quite happily with my ISIC card, so meh.
IIRC, New College weren't NUS while we were undergrads, but Balliol was... I enjoyed having an NUS card at the time - and didn't know about ISIC cards. The college politics sorts tended not to be interested in NUS politics for many of the reasons outlined. (I think there may actually have been quite poor relationships between oxbridge reps and non-oxbridge reps for some reason...) I know several folk who've gone successfully into (generally left wing) politics without ever having had to deal with the NUS. So, it's not necessary for that either.
I dunno if the NUS have tried to make themselves useful by organising anti-war/fees/cholesterol marches or whatever... But I suspect that such things can probably be arranged without an NUS as easily as with one...
I guess I'll probably vote against joining.
no subject
no subject
no subject
At the moment, I'm thinking that the services the NUS provide are probably gettable for less money elsewhere. I've no evidence, this is just a hunch. The first point is interesting though - exaggerations aside. If stuff's going to happen that affects students, who do you consult? If there's a central union of students, then there's an obvious answer. If not, do you ring round all the various individual student unions? I suppose that could work... But it's more effort, and therefore less likely to happen.