Gender-theory kru, your attention please:
I came across the following recently, and wondered if any of you might have some idea of its source:
I came across the following recently, and wondered if any of you might have some idea of its source:
Gender is not like some of the other grammatical modes which express precisely a mode of conception without any reality that corresponds to the conceptual mode, and consequently do not express precisely something in reality by which the intellect could be moved to conceive a thing the way it does, even where that motive is not something in the thing as such.Any thoughts? And can someone tell me what it means?
Tags: