January 2018

S M T W T F S
  123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
pozorvlak: (Default)
Friday, February 23rd, 2007 10:55 am
pozorvlak@delirium:~> clisp
  i i i i i i i       ooooo    o        ooooooo   ooooo   ooooo
  I I I I I I I      8     8   8           8     8     o  8    8
  I  \ `+' /  I      8         8           8     8        8    8
   \  `-+-'  /       8         8           8      ooooo   8oooo
    `-__|__-'        8         8           8           8  8
        |            8     o   8           8     o     8  8
  ------+------       ooooo    8oooooo  ooo8ooo   ooooo   8

Copyright (c) Bruno Haible, Michael Stoll 1992, 1993
Copyright (c) Bruno Haible, Marcus Daniels 1994-1997
Copyright (c) Bruno Haible, Pierpaolo Bernardi, Sam Steingold 1998
Copyright (c) Bruno Haible, Sam Steingold 1999-2000
Copyright (c) Sam Steingold, Bruno Haible 2001-2006

[1]> (defun car (x) (cdr x))

** - Continuable Error
DEFUN/DEFMACRO(CAR): # is locked
If you continue (by typing 'continue'): Ignore the lock and proceed
The following restarts are also available:
ABORT          :R1      ABORT
Break 1 [2]> continue
WARNING: DEFUN/DEFMACRO: redefining function CAR in top-level, was defined in
         C
CAR
[3]> (car '(3 4))
(4)
[4]> (defun defun (x) (+ 3 x))
DEFUN
[5]> (defun 7)
10

Bad. Ass.

[Those of you who don't speak Lisp may find a measure of enlightenment here. Should be reasonably accessible.]
pozorvlak: (Default)
Friday, October 6th, 2006 03:54 pm
Meme stolen from [livejournal.com profile] azrelle.

The first five people to respond to this post, will get some form of art, by me, about them. I make no guarantees about quality or type, but Iwill assure that I will give it good effort and that the art will be individual to you, so if you get a mixed CD or some sort of painting doodle, yours is the only one like it.

The only catch, of course; as with most memes, if you sign up, you have to put this in your own journal as well.
Tags:
pozorvlak: (Default)
Wednesday, May 3rd, 2006 12:59 pm
It's a little-appreciated fact that fans are chiral (ie, they come in left-handed and right-handed versions). Don't believe me? Lend your favourite fan to a friend, and watch them try to open it the wrong way, messing up the spokes. This has two downsides: first, the fact that your friends will infallibly open your fans the wrong way and damage them, and second, it makes fans uncomfortable to use with one hand or the other. My favourite fan, for instance, is right-handed, which means I can't fan myself with my left hand and write with my right hand. This sucks. Fortunately, I have an idea for an achiral fan, but I need some help with choice of materials and a few details of construction.

[Just so we're all on the same page: I'm talking about Japanese folding fans, IMNSFHO the best kind. Following the Wikipedia article I've just linked to, I'm going to call the paper bit that moves the air the "leaves", the things that hold this in place the "spokes", the thing around which the spokes rotate the "axle", and the heavy bits at the end of the leaves the "guards".]

The basic idea is to use thinnish wire for the spokes instead of slats of bamboo. Then the leaves can rotate freely around the spokes, allowing them to open in either direction. I've come up with a solution to the problem of attaching the leaves to the guards, but this still leaves the following problems:

  1. Attaching the spokes to the axle. You could maybe beat the ends of the wire flat, then punch a hole through, but if the metal's soft enough to be beaten like that it's probably too soft for use as a spoke. You could maybe attach the spoke to some sort of rotating block, but how? Remember that any such block would have to be less than a millimetre thick.
  2. Making the guards. Bamboo's ideal for this, but where do you get it from? And how do you work it? Are there any other good materials you could use?
  3. Decorating the fan. I'm thinking Chinese characters, because they look cool. Specifically, I'm thinking of using the kanji for "kanji". Self-reference in the finest tradition of Douglas Hofstadter :-)
So, any suggestions?

pozorvlak: (Default)
Tuesday, February 21st, 2006 05:39 pm
... and he's not going to sue me. *relief* :-)

Actually, he wrote me a really nice email, and even said my drawings were excellent. And I was right - the name Edward Monkton is a reference to Munch, and I'm apparently the first one to ask him that.

One thing he asked me to mention (well, sorta):
May I make a further point... when people discover that EM is a pseudonym they get very disappointed. If you are interested enough to share the information above, please bear in mind that my work is no less genuine for being created by someone with a different name. The name, as you now now, is as much a part of the art as... well... the art!

What a thoroughly nice chap. I may have to buy one of his mugs.

In other news, Arcadia read-through tonight... fingers crossed...
pozorvlak: (Default)
Monday, February 20th, 2006 02:16 pm
I've added a few more Expressionist Thoughts of Edvard Munchton (which I now realise I should have called the "Bohemian thoughts..." - ah well).
pozorvlak: (Default)
Sunday, February 19th, 2006 06:25 pm
I was talking to [livejournal.com profile] wormwood_pearl about the artistic skills, or lack thereof, of Johnny Stormonth-Darling, the twisted mind behind Rob the Dog and Tony the Pony. Weegies will know what I'm talking about: everyone else can click here and scroll down to the back page for a sample.
"He'll probably crop up again in five or ten years and turn out to be incredibly talented," she opined.
"Yeah. Did you know that Edvard Munch's juvenilia was almost photorealistic? There's a self portrait of him at nineteen that's just incredibly accurate and detailed [Ed. note: it looks a lot more impressive close to]. It was only later that he got into Expressionism."
"Expressionism?"
"Yeah, you know, The Scream, The Kiss..."
It turned out that I'd merely thought I'd said Edvard Munch. She'd heard it as Edward Monkton. Which led me to think about what a hybrid of the two might have created...

The Expressionist Thoughts of Edvard Munchton )

Incidentally, I've read that "Edward Monkton" is in fact another alias of Giles Andreae, aka Purple Ronnie... I've emailed him a link to these, in the hope that he finds them amusing and doesn't try to sue me. Anyway, the art of Edward Monkton and Edvard Munch is entirely the property of people who aren't me (Monkton and Munch's estate, presumably), and these drawings are in no way endorsed by either.

Extra bonus link: The list of 412 ways in which the Penguin of Death can kill you.

[Info about Munch's art comes from my trip to the Munch Museum in Oslo. Go, it's fantastic. And the Viking Ship Museum is pretty cool too. But don't bother with Grieg's cottage. Info about Munch's life comes from Jad Adams' excellent book Hideous Absinthe, which is also highly recommended.]
pozorvlak: (Default)
Monday, February 6th, 2006 06:52 pm
[crossposted from Hype]

A couple of days ago, Teflon posted this link on Hypothetical. It's about a history of recent Western music, overlayed onto the Tube map. Detail:



(You can download the whole thing here, or buy it as a poster from Transport for London, something I'm considering doing).

I think it's ace. Obviously, it reminds one of Simon Patterson's The Great Bear. But I always hated the Great Bear, simply because he'd made no effort to make the intersections make sense - even comparatively easy ones like footballers/philosophers (Camus, or possibly Cantona), philosophers/engineers (Wittgenstein), etc. There is, as far as I can see, no attempt to make it a map of anything, or to say anything about the people he mentions, or to understand anything about human history or knowledge in anything more than the most trivial way. It's a colossal wasted opportunity, and it makes me angry that he's put so little effort into it, when with a bit more thought it could have been fantastic. The musical one's much better. Though I'm a bit dubious about putting Delia Derbyshire way out on the edges of Classical rather than linking her with electronica, or putting Gershwin nowhere near jazz...