Going to the Adventure Film Festival yesterday didn't help, either...
1 Maybe I should have left that choice up to him, I dunno.
Scottish Juggling ConventionThe problem with this "debate" is that there is potentially a lot of money to be gained and lost, and so people are able to lay down massive amounts of pharmaceutical-grade bullshit to confuse and deceive. You can try to follow the climatological literature and critically read the writings of the deniers: but ultimately, both sides have accused the other of outright fabrication of data, so if you really want to know you'll have to go to Antarctica and repeat the key experiments yourself. Much as I'd like to go to Antarctica, this would be a bit tricky to fit into my teaching schedule. It's at this point that the kind of simplistic, ad hominem, follow-the-money line of argument that I outlined becomes quite valuable. Is the kind of climate instability we're noticing significant and unprecedented, or is it just part of an ordinary cycle, like the Medieval Warm Period (or whatever)? I'm not qualified to judge. I am, however, qualified to listen to others and guess at their motivations, and thus at whether they're likely to be lying to me or not.
[I'd also dispute your claim that doing things in a carbon-efficient way is going to be more expensive than doing things in a carbon-inefficient way. Most low-carbon technologies require higher up-front investment, but pay for themselves in the long term. One of the major obstacles to the improvement of, say, energy-efficient lightbulbs has been that the patents are held by the same people who hold the patents for incandescent bulbs, who don't want to endanger their revenue.]
( Herewith an executive summary )
He's also summarised his plan here, with timings.
I'm currently reading The Utility of Force by General Sir Rupert Smith, which, while not quite so well-written, is also fascinating. Yay for the Blackwell's sale! :-)
[Just so we're all on the same page: I'm talking about Japanese folding fans, IMNSFHO the best kind. Following the Wikipedia article I've just linked to, I'm going to call the paper bit that moves the air the "leaves", the things that hold this in place the "spokes", the thing around which the spokes rotate the "axle", and the heavy bits at the end of the leaves the "guards".]
The basic idea is to use thinnish wire for the spokes instead of slats of bamboo. Then the leaves can rotate freely around the spokes, allowing them to open in either direction. I've come up with a solution to the problem of attaching the leaves to the guards, but this still leaves the following problems: